<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Sense of Mobile Tagging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lunchpail.knotice.com/2009/11/18/making-sense-of-mobile-tagging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lunchpail.knotice.com/2009/11/18/making-sense-of-mobile-tagging/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:59:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connection at the Point of Decision &#171; The Lunch Pail</title>
		<link>http://lunchpail.knotice.com/2009/11/18/making-sense-of-mobile-tagging/#comment-2780</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Connection at the Point of Decision &#171; The Lunch Pail]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 20:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lunchpail.knotice.com/?p=2461#comment-2780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Making Sense of Mobile Tagging [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Making Sense of Mobile Tagging [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2D Mobile Tagging Updated Overview &#171; The Lunch Pail</title>
		<link>http://lunchpail.knotice.com/2009/11/18/making-sense-of-mobile-tagging/#comment-1643</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[2D Mobile Tagging Updated Overview &#171; The Lunch Pail]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 16:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lunchpail.knotice.com/?p=2461#comment-1643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] barcoding. We&#8217;ve explained the basic technology framework, and how it is applied. We’ve compared these technologies to each other and compared these technologies to other alternatives for linking physical and online experiences [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] barcoding. We&#8217;ve explained the basic technology framework, and how it is applied. We’ve compared these technologies to each other and compared these technologies to other alternatives for linking physical and online experiences [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Gordon</title>
		<link>http://lunchpail.knotice.com/2009/11/18/making-sense-of-mobile-tagging/#comment-971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Gordon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lunchpail.knotice.com/?p=2461#comment-971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the ease of using a QR code is &lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt; consideration for the company &lt;i&gt;developing&lt;/i&gt; a campaign, the most important factor is the ease of use for the end user and the general level of adoption for a technology. Given the Microsoft mobile OS, and the fact that the MS Tag reader technology is standard with a Windows Mobile phone, the adoption of the technology and ease of use of MS Tags for the end user is best.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Another important factor to consider is how much easier it is to access, download, and install an MS Tag reader than a QR reader. No matter what mobile OS a consumer has – Blackberry, Android, etc. – installing and using the MS Tag reader is easier than the QR reader.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Knotice would even put together a focus group where consumers had to download, install, and complete an end-to-end consumer experience to prove the point.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the ease of using a QR code is <i>a</i> consideration for the company <i>developing</i> a campaign, the most important factor is the ease of use for the end user and the general level of adoption for a technology. Given the Microsoft mobile OS, and the fact that the MS Tag reader technology is standard with a Windows Mobile phone, the adoption of the technology and ease of use of MS Tags for the end user is best.</p>
<p>Another important factor to consider is how much easier it is to access, download, and install an MS Tag reader than a QR reader. No matter what mobile OS a consumer has – Blackberry, Android, etc. – installing and using the MS Tag reader is easier than the QR reader.</p>
<p>Knotice would even put together a focus group where consumers had to download, install, and complete an end-to-end consumer experience to prove the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metha</title>
		<link>http://lunchpail.knotice.com/2009/11/18/making-sense-of-mobile-tagging/#comment-970</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Metha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lunchpail.knotice.com/?p=2461#comment-970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quote: &quot;I find the Microsoft Tag solution provides the best tools for rendering, managing and scanning tags.&quot;

I think you need to put in more than simply generalized statement as such.

Personally I vote for QR code instead.

Why? Personal experience: our company was able to deliver a QR based end-to-end full life cycle solution (create, hosting, tracking, revising, report/chart, manage over web + mobile, branding decorations) in just one month, FROM SCRATCH!

Why? Because QR is open and free, not the one that you&#039;d expect from Microsoft.

I&#039;m afraid your statement smells advertising...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote: &#8220;I find the Microsoft Tag solution provides the best tools for rendering, managing and scanning tags.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you need to put in more than simply generalized statement as such.</p>
<p>Personally I vote for QR code instead.</p>
<p>Why? Personal experience: our company was able to deliver a QR based end-to-end full life cycle solution (create, hosting, tracking, revising, report/chart, manage over web + mobile, branding decorations) in just one month, FROM SCRATCH!</p>
<p>Why? Because QR is open and free, not the one that you&#8217;d expect from Microsoft.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid your statement smells advertising&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://lunchpail.knotice.com/2009/11/18/making-sense-of-mobile-tagging/#comment-968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[uberVU - social comments]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lunchpail.knotice.com/?p=2461#comment-968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by knotice: After Making Sense of #Mobile #Marketing, it&#039;s time to Make Sense of Mobile Tagging! http://bit.ly/4stSh4 #mobilemarketing #microsoft...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by knotice: After Making Sense of #Mobile #Marketing, it&#8217;s time to Make Sense of Mobile Tagging! <a href="http://bit.ly/4stSh4" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4stSh4</a> #mobilemarketing #microsoft&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

