Last week there was a storm brewing on Capitol Hill as the Senate Commerce Committee held a hearing on the status of the floundering Do Not Track initiative.In addition, Rockefeller claimed the AdChoices Program from the Digital Advertising Alliance doesn’t satisfy the FTC’s call for a Do Not Track standard.
The hearing on the Hill comes a few months after FireFox announced it would disable 3rd-party cookies by default.
Harvey Anderson, Mozilla’s SVP of business and legal affairs and general counsel told the hearing that the industry isn’t moving forward quickly enough.
Responding the slow pace of the initiative, California legislators introduced a bill designed to “require an operator to disclose whether or not it honors a request from a consumer to disable online tracking,” reads the draft legislation. “The bill would also require an operator to disclose if it does not allow third parties to conduct online tracking on the commercial Web site or online service.”
Matthew Schwartz at Information Week writes, “The proposed legislation sounds a rare note of clarity in the contentious debate surrounding do-not-track proposals, asking website operators simply: Do you honor consumers’ do-not-track requests?”
If an agreement is not reached soon, “escalation around these competing interests will create major problems for both individuals and the businesses that depend on the internet,” writes Peter Swire, The co-chair of the W3C Do Not Track standards process, at Wired.
So, what can be done to help advertisers, the government and consumers reach an acceptable agreement on Do Not Track?
Swire suggests negotiation. “A negotiated Do Not Track standard offers the best way to avoid the arms race: It would allow individual users to indicate whether they wish to have personalized ads based on their surfing habits. It would allow websites and advertising networks to continue their existing cookie-based models with the consumers who don’t opt out. And it would help avoid the sizzling controversy and escalation around cookie blocking and technical counter-measures.”
What are your thoughts on Swire’s comments and the current state of Do Not Track? Share below!

One overlooked challenge of adopting a customer-centric cross-channel approach for marketing is not technology – it’s people. Teams within your organization are aligned around channel-specific responsibilities. Budgets are designed around channel-specific activities. The traditional funnel concept no longer works, but that doesn’t mean anyone is racing to replace it.
First things first… this is not a review of the Pebble smart watch. If that’s what you’re looking for, you may be disappointed. I will make a few comments on my Pebble experience at the end, but that’s not what I want to focus on. 
Many major and mid-size brands have been slow to optimize their email campaigns for mobile device users. Yet today there is a wealth of available information – hard data – on the impact of mobile device users on marketing email programs. In fact we
I was extremely excited the day Mark Zuckerberg made the announcement about
A few things struck me as odd after I downloaded it. I knew what to expect from watching the videos about Home, but I didn’t expect it to immediately take over my entire phone. I thought that it would be like other widgets on my phone, where I had to log into them to get them to start running. Not with Home. It was automatically showing a slide show of photos from my friends as well as status updates and other things that they had posted. This made me realize that I have some amazing photographer friends and the way the slide show was presented, it made it look even better, but also annoyed me because it was an experience I wasn’t ready for.


